Quam ſententiam † in primìs probaſſe videtur Caietan. 2. 2. q. 66. art. 8. & nervosè defendit Epiſcop. de Chiapa in Apolog. contra Sepulved. & in tract. comprobatorio fol. 66. & 67. Victoria in 1. relect. de Indis, num. 40. & ſequentib. Soto in 4. diſtinct. 5. q. 1. art. 10. pag. 266. Covarru. in regul. peccatum, 2. part. §. 10. num. 4. & 5. Menchaca lib. 1. controverſ. illuſtr. cap. 24. & licèt ſub dubio, in ea magis reſidêre videtur Gregor. Lop, in d. l. 2. tit. 22. part. 2. gloſſa magna, col. antepen. ad medium, Corduba in quæſtionar. 1. part. q. 57. dub. 5. per totum, & ſequitur Mag. Bañez in 2. 2. q. 10. art. 10. col. 531. verſ. Sexta concluſio, & ſequent. ubi illam confirmat, & reſpondet argumentis, quæ in contrariũ adducuntur; docetq́ue, eam ſecuros fuiſſe omnes Magiſtros Theologos in Cathedris ſuis uſque ad noſtra tempora. Idẽ latè probat Ioſeph. Acoſta de procur. Ind. ſalu. lib. 1. cap. 5. & lib. 2. cap. 3. 4. 5. & 6. Gregor. de Valencia, 3. tomo, diſput, 1. q. 10. puncto 7. verſicul. Nihilominus contraria, col. 414. Molina de iuſt. & iure, tract. 2. diſput. 106. per totam, Ioan. Azorius lib. 8. inſtit. moral. cap. 26. verſicul. Octavò quæritur, col. 1276. in fine, Fr. Auguſt. Davila in hiſt. Mexicana lib. 1. cap. 24. & 25. pag. 95. & 96. Pat. Ludovic. Turrianus de fide, articul. 11. diſput. 52. dub. 2. colum. 646. & 647. multa tamen commiſcens, quæ ſigillatim tractari, & expendi debuiſſent Fr. Thomas à Ieſu de procur. omn. gent. ſalute lib. 4. part. 1. dub. 4. pag. 207. Et tãdem in eandem opinionem magis inclinare videtur Hieron. Zevallos 4. tom. commun. q. ſin. num. 189. cum ſequentib. videndus, ex num. 129. & noviſsimè poſt hæc ſcripta Pat. Suarez in tract. de Charit. diſput. 13. ſect. 5. num. 1. & ſequentibus, & Auctor libri Maris Liberi cap. 2. quem refert. Seraph. Freitas de Imp. Aſiatico, cap. 3. num. 4. & idem Freitas magis ex profeſſo de hoc titulo diſputans. eod. lib. cap. 12. & Ant. Ricciullus de iur. perſon. lib. 2. cap. 31.