Quæ diſtinctio in utraque ſui parte verâ eſſe videtur. Nam † errorem in Dei cognitione, & cultu, ac myſterijs fidei, etiam quæ ad ſalutem ſunt neceſſaria, omnes auctores magis communiter in infidelibus excuſare ſolẽt, & invencibilem ſive inculpabilem ignorantiam admittere tradunt, ſi illis talia myſteria propoſita non fuerint, nec per eos ſteterit, quominus proponerentur, ut conſtat ex D. Thom. 2. 2 quæſt. 10. artic. 1. Durand. in 3. diſtin. 25. q. 1. ad 1. Victoria in relect. de Indis, concluſ. 1. & ſequentib. Conrad. de contract. quæſt. 100. Almain. tract. 1. moral. cap. 4. propoſ. 2. Vega lib. 6. de iuſtificat. cap. 18. Alphonſ. de Caſtro lib. 2. de lege pœnali, cap. 14. Pet. de Soto in tract. de ration. meden. peccat. lect. 2. poſt medium, Gabriel Vazquez in 1. 2. q. 76. artic. 2. diſput. 120. Pat. Suarez in tract. de fide, diſput. 17. ſect. 1. & 2. per totam, & diximus ſuprà hoc lib. cap. 10. num. 79.